Fair Lending, CRA, and Small Business Loan Data Filing - 2023
Presented by
Kimberly Boatwright
Recorded on June 7, 2023
Have you completed this webinar? Please tell us what you think.
For the past decade there has been a constant stream of enforcement actions against financial institutions for engaging in redlining. Redlining occurs when financial institution practices result in the restriction of lending in a particular geographic area, quite frequently a low-income or a high minority population area. Redlining is:
Fair lending laws, the Equal Credit Opportunity, and Fair Housing Acts, prohibit illegal discrimination on a prohibited basis. CRA deals with income disparities, requiring financial institutions to meet the needs of their entire community, including low- and moderate-income areas. For years, both CRA and HMDA regulations have provided the data needed to test financial institutions on how well they do in meeting the needs of those they serve.
On March 30, 2023, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) published an 888-page final rule to implement Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act. That section amends the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) to require financial institutions to collect and report certain data in connection with credit applications made by women, minority, and/or LGBTQI+ owned businesses and small businesses.
The industry is in full agreement that implementation of the new rule will consume extensive time and resources.
The combination of these critical regulations will bring to light issues in lending policies and will highlight a lack of lending in certain areas which is a direct link to Redlining. The financial institutions that fail to meet the credit needs of its selected assessment area are a target of special interest groups. The populations of the redlined areas are often high minority (fair lending) and low income (CRA). That is the collision of fair lending and CRA. What will the future bring with the passing of Small Business Data Collection 1071 regulations.
The concept of Reasonable Expected Marketing Area (REMA) has been used by regulators in recent years. REMA is not defined by law, is not covered in fair housing or CRA regulations, and is barely mentioned in examination procedures. For such a poorly defined concept it has caused big problems for many financial institutions.
The CRA regulations are in the process of being revised. The OCC, FDIC and Federal Reserve Board have not completed their CRA revisions. The program discusses how the concept of redlining is impacted by the revised CRA regulations.
WHY?
This program explains the intersection and gaps between the regulations and the current proposal for CRA. Knowing what is in place and what to expect will aid institutions in understanding the risks and mitigants to have a plan in place to avoid issues. It reviews recent cases analyzing the problems in each institution that lead to the charges, the penalties imposed, and the corrective action required in each case. It clarifies the concept of REMA.
Participants receive a manual that serves as a handbook long after the program is completed.
Upon completion of this program participants understand:
This program is designed for members of the board of directors, managers of all lending departments, bank counsel, compliance officers, loan officers, and auditors.
Kimberly Boatwright
Access Webinar
Slides
Section 1071
Questions and Answers